The Effects of Text Structure on learners’ reading: A multimodal Perspective from eye-tracking
Abraham, P., Farías, M. (2017). Reading with eyes wide open: reflections on the impact of multimodal texts in second language reading. in Ikala 22(1), 57-70.
Alderson, J.C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baharani, B., & Ghafournia, N. (2015). The impact of multimodal texts on reading achievement:a study of Iranian secondary school learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4, 161-170.
Bateman, J. A. (2008). Multimodality and genre: a foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Bateman, J. A. (2009). Discourse across semiotic modes, in J. Renkema, ed. Discourse, of course: An overview of research in discourse studies. Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 55–66.
Bateman, J. A. (2011). The decomposability of semiotic modes, in K. L. O’Halloran and B. A. Smith, eds, ‘Multimodal Studies: Multiple Approaches and Domains’, Routledge, London, pp. 17–38.
Bateman, J. A., Wildfeuer, J., & Hiippala, T. (2017). Multimodality: Foundations, research and analysis – A problem-oriented introduction. De Gruyter Mouton.
Bernhardt, E. B. (1991). Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, empirical and classroom perspectives. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Bezemer, J. & Kress, G. (2010). Changing text: a social semiotic analysis of textbooks. Designs for Learning, 3(1–2), 10–29.
Birch, B. (2007). English L2 Reading: Getting to the Bottom, 2nd Ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., He, L., Deconinck, J., Stengers, H., Eyckmans, J., (2017). Typographic enhancement of multiword units in second language text. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27, 448.
Brante, E. W., Holmqvist O. M., & Nyström, M. (2013). Exploring the impact of contrasting cases in text and picture processing. Journal of Visual Literacy, 32(2), 15-38.
Brantmeier, C. (2003). Beyond Linguistic Knowledge: Individual Differences in Second Language Reading. Foreign Language Annals, 36 (1), 33-44.
Brantmeier, C. (2005). Effects of reader’s knowledge, text type, and test type on L1 and L2 reading comprehension in Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 37–53.
Cohen, D. L. and Snowden, J. L. (2008). The relations between document familiarity, frequency, and prevalence and document literacy performance among adult readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(1), 9–26.
Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164-195.
Daly, A., & Unsworth, L. (2011). Analysis and comprehension of multimodal texts. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34 (1), 61 – 80.
Fairlie, D., Beltran, D., & Das, L. (2010). Home Computers and Educational Outcomes:Evidence from the NLSY97 and CPS. Economic Inquiry, 48, 771–792.
Giaschi, P. (2000). Gender positioning in education: A critical image analysis of ESL texts. TESL Canada Journal, 18(1), 32 – 46.
Guichon, N., & Mclornan, S. (2008). The Effect of multimodality on L2 learners: implications for CALL resource design. System, Elsevier, 36(1), 85-93.
Harrison, C. (2003). Visual social semiotics: Understanding how still images make meaning. Applied Theory: Technical Communication, 50(1), 50.
Hiippala, T. (2012). Reading paths and visual perception in multimodal research, psychology and brain sciences. Journal of Pragmatics 44(3), 315–327.
Holsanova, J., Homlberg, N., and Holmkvist, K. (2008). Reading information graphics: the role of spatial contiguity and dual attention guidance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1-12.
Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (2006 ), Reading Images: the grammar of visual design, Routledge, London and New York.
Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality: Challenges to thinking about language. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 337-340.
Kress, G. (2005). Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning. Computers and Composition, 22, 5–22.
Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87-113). London: Routledge.
Macedo-Rouet, M., Rouet, J., & Fayard, P. (2003). Reading and understanding a science report through paper and hypertext. Science Communication, 25(2), 99-128.
Mayer, R.E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Meyer, B. & Freedle, R.O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 121-144.
Phakiti, A. (2008). Construction validation of Bachman and Palmer’s (1996) strategic competence model over time in EFL reading tests. Language Testing, 25(2), 237-272.
Parodi, G. & Julio, C. (2017). More than words: Contending semiotic systems and the role of disciplinary knowledge in specialized text comprehension. Ibérica, Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para–Fines Específicos, (33),11-35.
Peirce, Charles S.; Buchler, Justus (ed.) (1955). The philosophical writings of Peirce, New York: Dover.
Roth, W., Pozzer-Ardhenghi, L. & Han, J. (2005). Critical graphicacy: Understanding visual representation practices in school science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Schmitt, J. and Wadsworth, J. (2006). Is there an impact of household computer ownership on children’s educational attainment in Britain? Economics of Education Review, 25, pp. 659–73.
Schnotz, W., Bannert, M., & Seufert, T. (2002). Towards an integrative view of text and picture comprehension: Visualization effects on the construction of mental models. In: The Psychologist of Science Text Comprehension, Edited by Jose Otero, Jose Antonio Leon, and Arthur Graesser, pp.385-316. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schnotz, W. & H. Horz (2010). New media. Learning from in E. Baker, P. Peterson, & B. McGaw (eds), International Encyclopedia of Education, 140-149. New York: Elsevier.
Sweller, J., Van Merrie¨nboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.
Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2017). A Complete Guide to the Theory and Practice of Materials Development for Language Learning. Hoboken: Wiley.
Unsworth, L. (2006). Image/text relations and intersemiosis: Towards multimodal text description for multiliteracies education. 33rd International Systemic Functional Congress. p.1165-1205.
Walsh, M. (2010). The textual shift: Examining the reading process with print, visual and multimodal texts. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24(5), 137-149.
Wang, F. Y., & Lee, S. Y. (2015). Free voluntary surfing: An extensive reading curriculum supported by technology. In L. H. Das, S. Brand-Gruwel, J. Walhout & K. Kok (Eds.), (2015). The School Library Rocks: Proceedings of the 44th International Association of School.
Wilhelm, J. D. (1995). Reading is seeing: Using visual responses to improve the literacy reading of reluctant readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 27(4), 467- 503.
Wolf, D. F. (1993). Issues in Reading Comprehension Assessment: Implications for the Development of Research Instruments and Classroom Tests. In: Foreign Language Annals, 26. S.322-331.
Copyright © 2022 Djiguimde. All rights reserved.